Suburbanization and the Making of the Black Urban Core

HistoryPolicyRace
Written By Nathaniel Steele

How White Flight, Federal Loans, and Redlining Redrew the Map of American Life

Drive through any major American city and the geography speaks before anyone does. Black neighborhoods clustered in older city centers. White suburbs stretching outward like rings of protected privilege. This pattern didn’t emerge by chance. It was drawn—block by block, loan by loan, policy by policy. And the tools of its construction weren’t cultural preferences or market forces. They were federal.

From the 1930s through the 1970s, a quiet revolution transformed the American landscape. It wore the language of growth and modernization, but its architecture was segregation. The suburban dream—the one that lifted millions of white families into middle-class comfort—was designed not just to include some but to exclude others. And that exclusion was Black by design.

It began during the Great Depression, when the federal government first intervened in the housing market. The Home Owners’ Loan Corporation, part of the New Deal response, created “residential security maps” to assess mortgage risk. These maps color-coded neighborhoods from green (“best”) to red (“hazardous”). A single factor determined the color more than any other: race. Black neighborhoods—regardless of income, housing condition, or crime rates—were redlined. Officially hazardous. Unworthy of investment.

The maps weren’t secret. In fact, they were used explicitly to guide private lending and public guarantees. A 1937 HOLC map of Philadelphia, for example, rated white working-class neighborhoods more favorably than Black middle-class ones nearby. The message was clear: whiteness stabilized property; Blackness endangered it. This was the birth of the racial geography we still live in. And the banks followed orders. Redlined neighborhoods were denied mortgages. They were denied capital. They were denied futures. This wasn’t the bias of a few racist loan officers—it was the written doctrine of American finance.

After World War II, two powerful federal engines fueled the housing boom: the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) and the Veterans Administration (VA). Together, they guaranteed millions of home loans, transforming the American housing market and making suburban homeownership attainable for white families across the country. But only if they were white. The underwriting manuals of these agencies warned against insuring mortgages in racially mixed or “infiltrated” neighborhoods. The term “integration” became synonymous with “decline.” The logic was circular and cruel: Black presence devalued property—because the government had declared it so.

The result was a federally subsidized suburbia, built on racial exclusion. Developments like Levittown, New York and Lakewood, California were financed with FHA loans—under the condition that they remain whites-only. Deeds included restrictive covenants, making it illegal to sell homes to Black families. In some cases, Asian and Latino families were excluded too, labeled as “foreign threats” to neighborhood stability. Indigenous families, relocated into cities under the Indian Relocation Act of 1956, often landed in the very neighborhoods these maps had deemed unworthy. Their erasure from housing policy maps mirrored their erasure from political ones.

Suburbia wasn’t just about lawns and good schools. It was a racial project. It was who gets the deed, who gets the vote, who gets the tax base, who gets remembered. While white families left for cul-de-sacs and rising home values, Black families were systematically locked out—often forced into exploitative contracts where they paid for years without gaining equity, stuck in neighborhoods the state had already chosen to abandon.

As federal subsidies expanded white suburbia, they hollowed out the cities. First came white flight—an exodus of taxpaying, voting, property-owning power. Then came disinvestment. Jobs followed the people. Infrastructure decayed. Schools declined. And as conditions worsened, a new narrative emerged: that these cities failed because the people in them did. That what happened to Detroit or Newark was a matter of culture, not capital.

Between 1950 and 1980, cities like Chicago, Cleveland, and Detroit lost hundreds of thousands of white residents. Black populations rose during that same period, confined by discriminatory rental markets, denied conventional loans, and targeted by speculators. In places like Baltimore and Philadelphia, Black veterans—who had fought for this country—were denied VA-backed mortgages in the very neighborhoods where white veterans bought homes on the GI Bill. A composite story repeats itself: a Black family offered only “contract buying”—paying inflated prices, without legal protections, in properties the city had already marked for decline. And yet they persisted, generation after generation, building lives in a rigged market.

By the 1970s, the “Black urban core” had fully taken shape. Entire cities had been redlined, emptied, and blamed. Schools were underfunded. Trash went uncollected. Loans were denied again, this time under a new name: “creditworthiness.” Public housing was demolished under urban renewal programs with no viable replacement. The federal government, having drawn the lines, retreated behind calls for “personal responsibility.”

But the maps don’t lie. The red zones of the 1930s eerily predict today’s poverty rates, school test scores, eviction filings, and health outcomes. The shape of inequality hasn’t changed—it’s just grown deeper. Not because Black families failed to thrive. But because the American state built a ladder to the suburbs for white people—and took the rungs away from everyone else.

Today, the average Black family holds just one-eighth the wealth of the average white family. The main reason isn’t income. It’s homeownership. A house bought with a government-backed loan in 1952 might now be worth $400,000. That house becomes a college fund, a down payment, an inheritance. Unless you were never allowed to buy it.

This isn’t just a history of space—it’s a history of power. Who gets to accumulate assets. Who governs school boards. Who draws district lines. Who gets the last word about what “community” means. Suburbanization in America was never race-neutral. It was policy, preference, and prejudice working together.

And until we confront the policies that built this world, we will keep mistaking the map for meritocracy. We will keep telling the lie that people ended up where they are because of what they did—rather than where the government put them, and where it refused to let them go. Until we redraw the lines, we are still living inside the old ones.

If the state had the power to segregate by design, what would it take—not symbolically, but structurally—to integrate by design?

Citations

Nathaniel Steele
Next

We Built This: The Black Economic Foundations of America